Overview of D.C. Great Ape Laws
Summary: This is a short overview of the District of Columbia's Great Ape laws.
Summary: This is a short overview of the District of Columbia's Great Ape laws.
Under Section 26-40a of Connecticut’s Fisheries and Game Law, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans are classified as “potentially dangerous animals” which may not be possessed by the general public. All federally licensed exhibitors and registered research facilities are exempt from the possession ban; however most private exhibitors (including circuses, wild animal parks, sanctuaries, and performing animal acts) are required to have a Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) permit to possess those apes.
Summary: This is a short overview of Colorado Great Ape law.
Summary: This is a short overview of California Great Ape law.
Summary: This is a short overview of Arkansas Great Ape law.
Summary: This is a short overview of Arizona Great Ape law.
Summary: In Alaska, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, and gibbons are considered âgameâ animals which are regulated by the stateâs Department of Fish and Game (DFG). In general, it is illegal to import and possess apes without a DFG permit.The following article begins with a general overview of the various state statutes and regulations affecting Great Apes. It then analyzes the applicability of those laws to the possession and use of apes for specific purposes, including their possession as pets, for scientific research, for commercial purposes, and in sanctuaries.
Summary: This article discusses the state laws that govern the import, possession, use, and treatment of Great Apes in Alabama. In Alabama, gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans and gibbons are considered âClass 1â wildlife, which means that they are among the most heavily regulated wild animals in the state. Although the possession and use of apes is heavily regulated in certain areas, such as display and exhibition, it is virtually unregulated in other areas. The following article begins with a general overview of the various state statutes and regulations affecting Great Apes. It then analyzes the applicability of those laws to the possession and use of apes for specific purposes, including their possession as pets, for scientific research, for commercial purposes, and in sanctuaries. The discussion concludes with a compilation of local ordinances which govern the possession and use of apes within geographic subdivisions of the state.
Summary: The following article discusses Wyoming Great Ape law. Wyoming has no law that restricts or otherwise mentions great apes. In fact, Wyoming does not even have a state endangered species provision providing additional state protection for endangered or threatened species. The only possible reference that could include great apes is the definition for âexotic speciesâ under the general fish and game code definitions. However, there are no accompanying restrictions on possession or importation of those exotic species. The stateâs cruelty law is broad enough to include great apes. There are no exceptions under the cruelty for scientific research or testing.
Summary: The following article discusses Wisconsin Great Ape law. Wisconsin does not have a specific law that prohibits the possession of apes or otherwise addresses their care. The state has a chapter on captive wildlife with a number of provisions related to the possession of captive live wild animals, which would generally include great apes.The stateâs endangered species law also prohibits the taking, transport, and possession of endangered or threatened species, including federally-listed species. It is unclear based on a reading of the law whether it requires state permits for foreign endangered species. The law specifically exempts zoological societies or municipal zoos from its reach. Finally, apes are covered generally under the stateâs anti-cruelty laws as warm-blooded, non-human animals. The law prohibits treating animals in a cruel manner, which includes causing unnecessary and excessive pain, suffering, or unjustifiable death. Additionally, all animals kept in captivity must have adequate food, water, and shelter.